SentraliQ turns a manual identity-posture review into a client-ready assessment and report in about an hour. Deterministic findings — no AI guessing at verdicts, nothing fabricated. Built for MSPs serving all-Microsoft shops under 300 seats.
Every managed-services agreement with an M365 client implies identity security work. Today that work is either done by hand, unbilled — or not done, undocumented. Both cost you.
Admin roles, stale accounts, OAuth grants, forwarding rules — half a day per tenant, spread across a dozen portal blades. That labor is bundled into the MSA. You're paying for it.
The day a client gets phished, the first question is what was reviewed, when, and what wasn't visible. Without a record, the answer defaults to you.
Every real finding is a remediation project with a client-ready justification attached. If nothing surfaces it, that revenue never exists.
Read-only Microsoft Graph consent on the client tenant. Minutes to set up. Nothing in the environment is changed — ever.
Deterministic checks across identities, privileged access, authentication posture, OAuth consents, guests and devices. Every verdict is rule-based and explainable — no LLM decides what's a finding.
A tenant-wide identity posture report your client can actually read: prioritized review items, severity that never gets quietly downgraded, and a coverage matrix showing what was checked.
The assessment shows the problem. Monitoring watches it: continuous detection on the same checks, delta alerting when posture changes, and retained forensics when something needs investigating. Same views, same depth — monitoring wins on time, not on locked features.
Most tools collapse "we found nothing" and "we couldn't look" into the same blank screen. For a security deliverable, that's not a UX shortcut — it's a false clean.
The check ran with full access and surfaced results, each with a deterministic, immutable severity.
The check ran with full access and found nothing. Clean because it was verified, not because it was skipped.
The tenant hasn't granted the permission this check needs. The report says so, plainly, instead of showing a blank.
Licensing or platform limits make this data unreachable in this tenant. Named, not hidden.
Not a dashboard your client will never log into — a document you hand them, with your engagement attached to it.
Microsoft gives you the raw data — spread across a dozen blades, with no verdicts and nothing you can hand a client. The data was never the problem. The deliverable is.
Great at multi-tenant management and automation. It's an operations console for you — not an assessment report for your client, and not a detection layer with an honesty model.
Built and priced for enterprises with a SOC to feed. A 60-seat law firm doesn't have one — and neither should its MSP need one to answer "who can do damage in this tenant?"
Nobody cheaply serves the all-Microsoft, sub-300-seat business through the MSP channel with an identity report you can hand to the client. That's the lane SentraliQ was built for.
SentraliQ is working with a small group of founding MSPs right now. You get a full assessment and client-ready report on a real tenant, direct access to the founder, and early pricing that stays with you. We get the feedback that shapes the product. Read-only access, minutes to connect, nothing changed in the environment.
No fabricated findings. No false clean claims. If we couldn't check it, the report says so.